5 ms·
The traditional computer chip will have a power draw proportional to frequency and the square of voltage, which itself must be increased to control delay and ra
by cornholio 3y ago
The traditional computer chip will have a power draw proportional to frequency and the square of voltage, which itself must be increased to control delay and raise frequency:
P ∝ C×V²×f
So if you are ready to accept a lower speed per core, the power draw can be controlled and you won't get a toaster.
One difficulty would be that modern technological nodes have high leakage and dissipate power even when they are not switching, making it more advantageous to clock aggressively, finish the computation as fast as possible and cut the power on that entire circuit for the remainder of the timer slot ("race to idle"), as opposed to reducing the frequency and prolonging the "on" phase.
But that's a deliberate design choice, knowing the chip will be cut out and fitted with a substantial thermal solution. Wafer level power draw it's definitely something you can control at the design stage.
- BizarroLand 3y agoI wonder when we'll convert to plasma computing, as in the entire instruction set and operators running as a waveform in a condensed cloud of plasma where the voltage outs at specific points equal the computational result of the inputs? If we could do that then we could run terahertz frequencies.
- AlotOfReading 3y agoHow does whatever you're talking about differ from the thyratrons that were used in early vacuum tube computers and decidedly do not scale to THz clock frequencies?
- jbverschoor 3y agoDo we really need a clock for computing?
- tiberious726 3y agoDefinitely not: https://www.achronix.com/ https://www.achronix.com/