3 ms·
I guess that's a consequence of directly causing the deaths of 346 people. We are right to scrutinise them harshly.
by mvdtnz 3y ago
I guess that's a consequence of directly causing the deaths of 346 people. We are right to scrutinise them harshly.
- glitchc 3y agoHere is a list of the top ten causes of death in the US [1]. You will have a much better chance of reducing your risk of dying by giving up drinking and eating fatty foods than by giving up flying on a Boeing aircraft. [1] https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/leading-causes-of-death.htm https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/leading-causes-of-death.htm
- colpabar 3y agoWhat is your point?
- chx 3y ago1. This is misleading because the number of people flying on airplane is significantly lower than those who have a chance for heart disease because they have a heartbeat. 2. Not flying on Boeing aircraft is much, much easier to do than avoiding heart disease.
- mvdtnz 3y agoThis is a really weird response, man.
- kingwill101 3y agoAnd how does that negate Boeing's maintenance woes?