3 ms·
If your aim is to travel there are arguably safer alternatives to flying in a 737-MAX that fulfill the same purpose, namely flying in a pre-MAX 737 model or on
by Mordisquitos 3y ago
If your aim is to travel there are arguably safer alternatives to flying in a 737-MAX that fulfill the same purpose, namely flying in a pre-MAX 737 model or on any Airbus model. If you have no alternatives available and you are so scared of the 737-MAX that you choose not to travel it may be irrationally overcautious, but there is arguably a minuscule increase in safety nonetheless.
If your aim is to improve your immunity to an infectious disease, the only alternative to vaccination that fulfills the same purpose is to catch the disease, which is definitely not safer. If you are so afraid of FDA corruption in favour of pharma companies (or of needles) that you choose to avoid improving your immunity altogether, you're still at risk of catching the disease anyway, which is clearly less safe than any purported risk of getting vaccinated (that is, unless you make huge changes in your lifestyle to avoid human contact).