3 ms·
I agree with the overall thrust of your argument, but I disagree with this one somewhat: > Therefore, based on Occam's razor, we may provisionally assume that
by xmonkee 3y ago
I agree with the overall thrust of your argument, but I disagree with this one somewhat:
> Therefore, based on Occam's razor, we may provisionally assume that all matter possesses some degree of consciousness -- this is the simplest assumption.
An even simpler first few steps:
* We experience matter, but we aren't sure if matter exists outside of our experience of it
* Therefore, based on Occam's razor, we may provisionally assume that all matter exists only within our consciousness -- this is the simplest assumption.
- lutusp 3y ago> * We experience matter, but we aren't sure if matter exists outside of our experience of it A nice point. One might call it the the solipsistic argument. Not easy to argue against, and not unlike the debate about consciousness -- we aren't close to saying what it is, or which assemblies of matter can be reliably said to possess it.