> The other replies you've gotten are inaccurate and about 15+ years out of date in thinking about protein structure. I do not believe the case, speaking as on

> The other replies you've gotten are inaccurate and about 15+ years out of date in thinking about protein structure. I do not believe the case, speaking as one of the others replies, and having reviewed the others. But since you do, could I request the extra work of some pointers to the inaccuracies? NMR-driven descriptions of protein structure flexibility are far more than 15 years old, and common in all graduate bio courses since the 90s, so if I'm perpetuating some sort of inaccuracy I'd really like to know so I can stop.