3 ms·
This is the problem with terms like this. There are definitions in academia/industry that differentiate between awareness, consciousness, qualia, intelligence,
by peterlk 3y ago
This is the problem with terms like this. There are definitions in academia/industry that differentiate between awareness, consciousness, qualia, intelligence, sentience, and more. But these distinctions require some pondering to understand and are divergent from general understanding which treats them as roughly the same thing. For example, consciousness for me is the ability for something to take directed action to affect their surroundings. This means that a robot can be conscious. But now the question for what we’re talking about here is: is it aware? It is possible to display consciousness without awareness (see blindsight studies), but to my knowledge it is not possible to be aware without consciousness. And then we get to sentience, which is still very slippery, and often relies on definitions involving “qualia”, which is also quite slippery.
- lebuffon 3y agoI have no formal knowledge in the domain to go much deeper but I can understand the problem you stated about defining the terms properly. I suppose this spinning around on word definitions is similar to my "awareness of awareness" description in that we have the ability to ponder the meaning of the very tool (language) that we are thinking with. But my old head begins to implode if I go very deep...