3 ms·
I went I read the first few paragraphs I thought, "Is someone ripping off Stuart Kaufmann? He was writing about this idea thirty years ago." Then I read the fir
by jyounker 3y ago
I went I read the first few paragraphs I thought, "Is someone ripping off Stuart Kaufmann? He was writing about this idea thirty years ago." Then I read the first author: Stuart Kaufmann.
For those of you following along at home, Kaufmann has been developing the ideas here for decades. The paper is less a "here is a new idea" and much more "here is a concise summary of 50 years of work". The words and thoughts seem opaque, but this is case where they actually have concrete and specific meanings. It's worth noting too, that towards the end of the article he outlines experiments that could be used to falsify the theory.
If you want a really hard-core dive into the ideas, then check out his 1993 book, "On The Origins of Order" (ISBN 978-0-19-507951-7).
https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-origins-of-order-9780195079517 https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-origins-of-order...
- jamesblonde 3y agoRecommend reading along with order out of chaos and anything from Prigogine in the 80s (not his last book).
- enneff 3y agoIt doesn’t seem opaque to me and I’m no scientist. Pretty clearly expressed imo.
- willlma 3y agoSo you didn't look any of these terms up? Would love an explanation of * Kantian Wholes * Catalytic Closure * Constraint Closure * Spatial Closure * a first-order phase transition to molecular reproduction * phylogeny of metabolisms * template replication Thanks