4 ms·

We can't share anything about future product plans, but in general, as few as possible. We want to avoid splitting out into too many different ecosystems of pa

by nrp 3y ago

We can't share anything about future product plans, but in general, as few as possible. We want to avoid splitting out into too many different ecosystems of parts, and instead maximize the size of the install base within a cross-compatible ecosystem.

mft_ 3y ago
It's notable that a lot of 'smaller' laptops are coming along with ~14" now, rather than the 13" standard. I appreciate that the FW13 is really FW13.5, but if the next work you focus on (having launched the 16) is a FW14 or FW14.5, that would be lovely - especially if you took the opportunity to shave a few hundred grams off it as well!
- Steltek 3y ago
  I'm very against this trend. It's a bit like how compact cars have been slowly ruined by getting bigger and bigger. 13" is a great size for a truly portable use case.
  - mft_ 3y ago
    Different strokes for different folks, I guess :) I find a 'standard' 13" (as on an older Macbook Air, for example, which I think is technically 13.3" and 16:10?) a bit too claustrophobic for anything creative - either due to apps needing toolbars, or my workflow needing multiple windows accessible (e.g. coding, with VSCode, a shell or two, and a browser for docs and StackOverflow). A 15" (which I have now) is nice to work with, but then the laptop becomes a touch too heavy for travelling comfort (unless this is something you specifically optimise for when buying e.g. [0] - but then there are other tradeoffs). Thus I wonder if a 14-14.5" with minimal bezels, set in a lightweight chassis similar to a traditional 13" (see how big the bezels are on an older Macbook Air, for example - lots of space for a larger screen without unduly enlarging the chassis) might not be a sweet spot? [0] https://www.lg.com/de/notebooks/gram/15z90rt-g-aa78g/ https://www.lg.com/de/notebooks/gram/15z90rt-g-aa78g/

4 ms·

We can't share anything about future product plans, but in general, as few as possible. We want to avoid splitting out into too many different ecosystems of pa

by nrp 3y ago

mft_ 3y ago
It's notable that a lot of 'smaller' laptops are coming along with ~14" now, rather than the 13" standard. I appreciate that the FW13 is really FW13.5, but if the next work you focus on (having launched the 16) is a FW14 or FW14.5, that would be lovely - especially if you took the opportunity to shave a few hundred grams off it as well!
- Steltek 3y ago
  I'm very against this trend. It's a bit like how compact cars have been slowly ruined by getting bigger and bigger. 13" is a great size for a truly portable use case.
  - mft_ 3y ago
    Different strokes for different folks, I guess :) I find a 'standard' 13" (as on an older Macbook Air, for example, which I think is technically 13.3" and 16:10?) a bit too claustrophobic for anything creative - either due to apps needing toolbars, or my workflow needing multiple windows accessible (e.g. coding, with VSCode, a shell or two, and a browser for docs and StackOverflow). A 15" (which I have now) is nice to work with, but then the laptop becomes a touch too heavy for travelling comfort (unless this is something you specifically optimise for when buying e.g. [0] - but then there are other tradeoffs). Thus I wonder if a 14-14.5" with minimal bezels, set in a lightweight chassis similar to a traditional 13" (see how big the bezels are on an older Macbook Air, for example - lots of space for a larger screen without unduly enlarging the chassis) might not be a sweet spot? [0] https://www.lg.com/de/notebooks/gram/15z90rt-g-aa78g/ https://www.lg.com/de/notebooks/gram/15z90rt-g-aa78g/