> If it's not relevant, it shouldn't be in the system in the first place It was when it was created, it's not now. And it is then practically removed. Again y

> If it's not relevant, it shouldn't be in the system in the first place It was when it was created, it's not now. And it is then practically removed. Again you can build whatever workflow you want, tag stuff or move things if they're super important to you. Subscribe to them if they're vital. Or don't auto close if that doesn't work for you. I don't think that having a tiny number of issues that are * Never looked at * Never prioritised * Never searched for * Not subscribed to by anyone that cares about them * Somehow super important to not have a "cancelled" status on them Should define your workflow to this degree that you start keeping multiple lists of work. I'm not sure I've ever come across an issue worth leaving like this. Can you tell me about an issue that fits this description?