4 ms·
60hz is great while looking at a screen but may not be enough for keeping a good illusion going while you move around space. hololens has a similar setup that r
by jazzyjackson 3y ago
60hz is great while looking at a screen but may not be enough for keeping a good illusion going while you move around space. hololens has a similar setup that renders triangles at whatever rate it can but updates the position on the display at 240hz (that is, even if the next frame of an animation is lagging, its position in space will be adjusted as you move)
imo the illusion was rock solid, extremely challenging given that the display was transparent so you had to keep up with the real backdrop moving - vision pro and all passthrough devices get to fake it but at the cost of proprioception as you said
- naikrovek 3y agoThe HoloLens was amazing and underrated among the wider internet. Like a lot of Microsoft stuff, it's regarded as a joke until Apple copies it, then suddenly everyone takes it seriously.
- iandanforth 3y agoNope, still a joke. Like many MS products individual pieces of tech may be incredible but the overall experience is severely lacking. So while you might say "this one aspect of the display technology is incredible!" everyone who's actually used it will reply, "yeah and if it didn't feel like looking through a postage stamp then it would have been great!"
- naikrovek 3y ago> everyone who's actually used it I have four of them at work. I have thousands of hours on them. They’re amazing.