4 ms·
The comment you're replying to mentions some limitations of the current state of the art. I agree that there's no reason to change just because something is ol
by gumby 3y ago
The comment you're replying to mentions some limitations of the current state of the art.
I agree that there's no reason to change just because something is older than some threshold. Bit I think the roughly 15 year cadence has reflected the time it has taken for a new VCS idea to develop and then become mainstream enough for its drawbacks to become annoying enough that it loops again.