4 ms·
You seem to be consistently missing the fact that the act of “seeing” is bound by c
by dilyevsky 3y ago
You seem to be consistently missing the fact that the act of “seeing” is bound by c
- floxy 3y agoHmm, I don't follow your assertion. For the case under consideration, there is no "seeing" at a distance.
- dilyevsky 3y ago> It seems like with a sufficiently slow separation of the two clocks, you should be able to see if the you get "0.1c" in one orientation, and "1.9c" in the other. No you wouldn’t be able to “see” it. If your clocks are off you dont know that and by how much until you bring it back and compare. That's Special Relativity