3 ms·
SSM is a great alternative, but it's a managed solution. Embrasure is self-hosted.
by TaronAvagyan 3y ago
SSM is a great alternative, but it's a managed solution. Embrasure is self-hosted.
- minebreaker 3y agoThanks for your reply, but as far as I read the documentation, your solution relies on AWS. If so, manged vs self-hosted is not really an issue since you are already locked into AWS. If it works without AWS, then it makes sense.
- linuxdude314 3y agoIt’s self managed, AWS is hosting it. This may seem like nit picking, but I can assure you confusing your audience will hamper the success of your project if you are aiming for growth.
- _r5xp 3y ago[dead]
- throwaway883322 3y agoQuote from Dreamfactory: > "Typically, self-hosted software is installed and operated on servers physically located within the organization’s premises" When you claim it is self hosted everyone assumes you can host it anywhere, including AWS if they want. Your software can't do that. You need to make it clear, otherwise you will alienate your potential users. You may be technically correct for a limited definition of self hosted, but that is not what users expect.
- BrandoElFollito 3y agoI work in Cybersecurity. If I hear self-hosted, I understand "on premises", that is that the service is inside the company. "Self-hosted at AWS", while technically correct, is not what springs to mind and can bite you back. I agree that self learned, hosted at AWS is best and your will get more relevant traction
- redeeman 3y agoI do wonder why OP is so set on calling it self hosted, when it seems quite obvious that more or less nobody has the same definition of self hosted