4 ms·
the player walkout was due to changes in the league made by Riot, specifically that orgs are no longer required to have academy teams (academy teams are the equ
by PH95VuimJjqBqy 3y ago
the player walkout was due to changes in the league made by Riot, specifically that orgs are no longer required to have academy teams (academy teams are the equivalent of college teams, not pro but better than most players).
you're overselling that unnecessarily.
But the point about the abuse is true and it wasn't just sexual abuse, it was harassment at all levels.
for anyone not aware:
https://kotaku.com/top-riot-executive-suspended-without-pay-following-inve-1831084598 https://kotaku.com/top-riot-executive-suspended-without-pay-...
> Earlier this week, Riot’s CEO sent an e-mail to employees describing the punishment its COO, Scott Gelb, will face after multiple employees alleged that, as a comedy bit, he has repeatedly touched subordinates’ balls or butt or farted in their faces. Several employees tell Kotaku that his punishment—two months of unpaid leave and training—is far from satisfactory.
you can't make this shit up, and in fact it's so ridiculous we don't need to mislabel the player walkout, the truth is bad enough by itself.
- gurchik 3y agoI'm sorry, I didn't intend to say that the player walkout was due to sexual harassment or discrimination claims. The player's association voted for a walkout because the players did not have faith in Riot and in fact believed that their decisions were jeopardizing the health of the esport. I agree the player walkout had nothing to do with the employee walkout and in fact it happened much later, after the lawsuit had already been settled. The way I wrote the comment made it seem like they were the same when it was actually my intention to say the opposite. I was trying to say that Riot has failed in other ways unrelated to sexual harassment and discrimination.