3 ms·
> Won't you always be able to use it for local networks? Well for me until Linux shall support IPv4 my machines shall be on IPv4 behind NAT. And yet I'm enjoyi
by TacticalCoder 3y ago
> Won't you always be able to use it for local networks?
Well for me until Linux shall support IPv4 my machines shall be on IPv4 behind NAT. And yet I'm enjoying IPv6 with my ISP-provider router transparently doing the heavy lifting and using IPv6.
> and completely block outgoing and incoming per-device-IPv6.
Same. I do just that: it's disable by a kernel parameter, in sysctl and in the firewall, just in case I'd mess up and re-enable one or two of these.
You can pry IPv4 on my LAN from my cold dead hands.
- X-Istence 3y agoHow is your isp provided router doing the heavy lifting? You’ve turned off IPv6… you won’t be able to reach IPv6 resources.
- qwertox 3y agoIn my case I run a double NAT. I don't consider the subnet which the ISP's router offers to me as something belonging to me, but something the ISP owns. In that subnet I have one honeypot (old Raspi) and a router which treats that subnet as the internet and offers me my own subnet which I call home. I don't care what the ISP does with the router it provides to me. If it uses IPv6 or whatever. In my case their router will only see another device which is only capable of using IPv4, so it better deal with it.
- Dagger2 3y agoWhat happens if you try to reach e.g. https://loopsofzen.uk/ https://loopsofzen.uk/? It sounds like it's not going to work. Nobody is suggesting you stop using v4 on your LAN, but you do need to use v6 on it.