3 ms·
I mean, a large fraction of people of course had to continue working in situ through the pandemic because it's physically impossible to do their job remotely. O
by Sharlin 3y ago
I mean, a large fraction of people of course had to continue working in situ through the pandemic because it's physically impossible to do their job remotely. Office workers had the privilege of being able to go remote, but in these discussions it feels like people believe non-office jobs don't even exist and that the entire world just started working from home. 25 years ago everyone would have simply done the same as teachers and nurses and store clerks in fact did have to do.
- midasuni 3y agoIt was far better going into an office with no traffic, being able to drive there rather than a crowded train and tube, having an office with maybe 90% of the normal occupants missing, and plenty of room for those of us who were in. WFH is great for those who commute to an office, it’s quieter than working on a Sunday.
- ghaff 3y agoOh, I agree. WFH would have been a blip that mostly didn't work very well for the relative handful of people not already able to do it. Everyone else would have been back in their offices pretty quickly.