3 ms·
That would require that religion exists outside of human experience, to be discovered and understood and awoken to - which is a nice story, but not strictly tru
by mock-possum 3y ago
That would require that religion exists outside of human experience, to be discovered and understood and awoken to - which is a nice story, but not strictly true.
There is no religion, outside of what we imagine. We made it up. It isn’t like the water cycle, it’s not something just waited to be discovered by humans who know how to look for it. Religion is fantasy.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- matrix87 3y ago> There is no religion, outside of what we imagine. You're making a metaphysical claim here, good luck proving it Someone mentions religion and you come along and decide to attack it with the same cliche. Why?
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- asveikau 3y agoI'm not totally convinced objective reality exists either. This kind of existential question cannot really be answered. You presumably think, as I tend to also, that what we describe in our scientific understanding exists independently of us, and it is there to be discovered, understood, and awoken to. But we can't really know that we're not "imagining" in a similar way as your derisive description of religion. Further, if objective reality exists, it's very, very vast, and we are very small, our senses and cognition limited, and we are likely unable to comprehend it. Really in all cases, religious and secular, we make the best guesses available to us. I think we need to be humble about all of this.