3 ms·

So? Let's think of a story, say there are 2 companies that make Orange juice A and B, and we have evidence that in some of company A juice some rat excrement w

So? Let's think of a story, say there are 2 companies that make Orange juice A and B, and we have evidence that in some of company A juice some rat excrement was found a few years back , they promised to fix it but this month again we found evidence in a bottle of rat excrement. And your reply sounds like, the chance of you dying from this is lover then if you eat a delicious hamburger so you should continue buying from company A even if you know that they do not took the rat problem serious and probably if we would check all the bottles of juice from A and do deep scan we would find much more problems. If you continue to give money to A why would they hire back the QA people they fired before so they can get giant bonuses. IMO it is proven that Boeing does not care about your safety, they just asked for an exception for a safety requirement, putting the passanger safety responsibility on pilots training and memory because fixing the issue the proper way would cost time and money and that is more important then safety. https://simpleflying.com/boeing-requests-boeing-737-max-7-certification-exemption/ https://simpleflying.com/boeing-requests-boeing-737-max-7-ce...

hedgehog 3y ago
I live in the US and drink orange juice about once a year so it's not worth even thinking about whether there might be a safety differential between brands, it'll work itself out. On the other hand diet, sleep, exercise, driving habits, exposure to infectious disease (mostly COVID right now), etc, all have significant impact on odds of getting sick, injured, or dying.
weaksauce 3y ago
> IMO it is proven that Boeing does not care about your safety, they just asked for an exception for a safety requirement, putting the passanger safety responsibility on pilots training and memory because fixing the issue the proper way would cost time and money and that is more important then safety That's a rather uncharitable take on what they are asking for which is a temporary reprieve over a pretty minor risk. > Boeing states it is working on a "long-term solution" for the problem, which would be rolled out across the entire global Boeing 737 MAX fleet. The FAA confirmed this, stating that Boeing is looking at design changes.

hedgehog 3y ago

I live in the US and drink orange juice about once a year so it's not worth even thinking about whether there might be a safety differential between brands, it'll work itself out. On the other hand diet, sleep, exercise, driving habits, exposure to infectious disease (mostly COVID right now), etc, all have significant impact on odds of getting sick, injured, or dying.

weaksauce 3y ago

> IMO it is proven that Boeing does not care about your safety, they just asked for an exception for a safety requirement, putting the passanger safety responsibility on pilots training and memory because fixing the issue the proper way would cost time and money and that is more important then safety That's a rather uncharitable take on what they are asking for which is a temporary reprieve over a pretty minor risk. > Boeing states it is working on a "long-term solution" for the problem, which would be rolled out across the entire global Boeing 737 MAX fleet. The FAA confirmed this, stating that Boeing is looking at design changes.