4 ms·
> What‘s terrifying is the previous non-FSD code that just centers the car in the lane and will hit anything protruding into the lane. Are you sure this is wha
by AlexandrB 3y ago
> What‘s terrifying is the previous non-FSD code that just centers the car in the lane and will hit anything protruding into the lane.
Are you sure this is what happened before? I've definitely seen Teslas avoiding obstacles in the road in various YouTube videos. Even "classic" (non neural net) robotics navigation systems can avoid static obstacles in their path pretty reliably.
- quonn 3y agoWell, the non FSD autopilot always does this for me. It would certainly hit things regularly. It does recognize moving cars but it would have hit countless parked cars on the right side had I not intervened.
- iknowstuff 3y agoAutopilot is entirely different from FSD.
- quonn 3y agoIt is not entirely different because the classic Autopilot was migrated from radar to vision-only and that surely was done by sharing some code. However the classic autopilot is outdated by 4 years. But my point was not about Autopilot vs. FSD but about the fact that the C++ control code is often rather stupid and unlikely to be as robust as end-to-end learning.
- iknowstuff 3y agoSome object detection code maybe, but behavior is entirely different. Zero code overlap