4 ms·
I don't think you want to use the term "arbitrary" here, since that would imply a stronger claim: that no matter how one defines "understanding" it applies. "Ye
by pohl 3y ago
I don't think you want to use the term "arbitrary" here, since that would imply a stronger claim: that no matter how one defines "understanding" it applies. "Yes, for some specific, narrow definition of 'understanding'" is better.
I understood what you meant, but my math reflexes had to say something.
- dkjaudyeqooe 3y agoI don't have any math reflexes, but my intuition was similar with the idea that there are so many possible (narrow) views of understanding that it becomes arbitrary.