7 ms·
> The claim being that its all propaganda, and what we know as 60s ideology (peace love etc) actually never really happened. What did happen was that those that
by chimeracoder 3y ago
> The claim being that its all propaganda, and what we know as 60s ideology (peace love etc) actually never really happened. What did happen was that those that prescribed to that line of thinking either moved to communes, or they dropped so much acid they were societally irrelevant.
This sounds like something you'd read in a pop psychology book, not an actual piece of historical analysis.
Given the visible cultural impact that the "ideology" (to use your word) had, and the sheer number of artifacts we have to attest to that, it's almost impossible to imagine how this claim could be substantiated.
Ironically, the only thing in that that's close to a correct statement is the line about communes and acid, which were actually a very small part of the "ideology" that you're referring to, and relatively rare, but which were amplified in public perception due to media portrayals.
- ldjkfkdsjnv 3y agoNo this opinion comes from Academia. A large volume of media was created in a very short time, and then essentially disappeared/stopped production over night
- kamranjon 3y agoYou say this but having an actual source would be great.
- mistermann 3y agoLSD is a hell of a drug, but it's nothing compared to consciousness + culture.
- revscat 3y agoThis is an incredibly difficult position to defend, and I would challenge you to do so.
- ericmcer 3y agoCouldn't we make the same claim about all polarized views (both right and left) that the media love to amplify today, but not many people actually hold?