3 ms·
Rather than "Better GIT", it would make sense to position it as "better GIT backend" in my opinion. I get the desire to replace GIT bash but it might be harder
by buremba 3y ago
Rather than "Better GIT", it would make sense to position it as "better GIT backend" in my opinion. I get the desire to replace GIT bash but it might be harder to convince developers, who is your target audience.
- sasham 3y agoYes you might be 100% right. We were debating this a lot in the beginning. In the end we decided to build a separate VCS with Git sync, and simpler UI (for now at least - might change, depends on user feedback)