4 ms·
This could be fair (?) if you are a billionaire. If I've been saving and investing most of my life, and I end up leaving €2-3m to my children, why would the tax
by HenryBemis 3y ago
This could be fair (?) if you are a billionaire. If I've been saving and investing most of my life, and I end up leaving €2-3m to my children, why would the taxman take 20-30-40% of it? (since you don't mention a percentage I came up with it).
Why should I be punished for 'not giving money back to the economy' (spending - ~25% VAT)?
Saving money gives the bank the ability to loan it to someone else (or even me), thus growing the economy.
Investing money gives the company (assuming stocks/etc.) funds to grow.
Am I being punished for not paying a VAT or ~25% (spending) but instead of paying 'only' the 15%-19% for capital gains tax (when my children close those positions)?
Heads I lose, Tails I lose?
- ttyprintk 3y agoSince you’re talking about fairness, Mossack Fonseca had 214,000 accounts. Many rich people are taking an option you don’t mention.
- ryandrake 3y ago> Investing money gives the company (assuming stocks/etc.) funds to grow. How does that work? If I buy 100 shares of MSFT from some other shareholder, no funds are going to Microsoft.