> When it's not subsidized by the unrelated business unit profit of a monopoly, well, yeah. Indeed. And that sucks for the consumer. Why should we consider sub

> When it's not subsidized by the unrelated business unit profit of a monopoly, well, yeah. Indeed. And that sucks for the consumer. Why should we consider subsidizing less profitable beneficial offerings with more profitable offerings a bad thing? That's how every charity the industrial barons put together that still maintain some of the civic spaces in the US came to be. The steel boom funding a library and an opera house and all that.