I understand you can give 1000's of reasons why it's fine. But it's still IMHO a sad reality that a giant cooperation cannot play it fair by being a corporate s

I understand you can give 1000's of reasons why it's fine. But it's still IMHO a sad reality that a giant cooperation cannot play it fair by being a corporate sponsor of the open source projects that they more or less wish to directly use as a service... I get that legally this is fine but ... Common... adapting FOSS for your own use cases in your basement or little company is still very different then a giant cooperation outcompeting you before you ever had a change... There might be room for a license to make FOSS software more like BSL if used by a company above a certain revenue threshold or w/e... Perhaps legally that's impossible, otherwise I have no idea why such a template does not exist yet.