4 ms·
Agreed with parent. Come take a stroll in my office; I work in a coporate bank. Most of my coworkers learned "real" programming in the 90s, when Java was the ho
by babarock 14y ago
Agreed with parent. Come take a stroll in my office; I work in a coporate bank. Most of my coworkers learned "real" programming in the 90s, when Java was the hot new thing on the block. To most of them, the whole Programming Language eco-system can be summarized to an endless "C++ vs Java vs C#" flamewar.
Just yesterday a colleague of mine looked at me with chock and awe when I told him I enjoy coding in C. "But... it's not OO!" he mumbled, puzzled.
Pushing the caricature a little further, Python and Ruby are toy languages that only hipsters use, Perl is only to be used by the sysadmin down the hall, and Lisp is the biggest failed experiment programmers ever came up with.
Pointy-haired bosses encourage this kind of thinking: They would never get in trouble for chosing a language amongst the big 3 (C++/C#/Java).
I once heard someone say: "I don't understand why there are still new languages coming out every day. Shouldn't everyone just use Java?"
- jasonlotito 14y ago> can be summarized to an endless "C++ vs Java vs C#" flamewar. As opposed to an endless "Ruby vs Python vs PHP" flamewar? Pushing the caricature a little futher, C++ and Java are enterprise languages that only old out-of-touch programmers use. Hipster Apple-using kids encourage this kind of thinking: They would never be un-cool for choosing a language among Ruby, Python, or Lisp. It's far too easy to become that type of programmer. Choice of language has little to do with it. No doubt you understand this, just making the point clear.
- babarock 14y agoYou sir made my day, thank you very much!