5 ms·
Harder to censor isn't exactly the goal. Harder to capture is. The point is to make social media providers replaceable so that users are able to express a choic
by pfraze 3y ago
Harder to censor isn't exactly the goal. Harder to capture is. The point is to make social media providers replaceable so that users are able to express a choice. We do this already with the feed algorithms, which are predominantly third-party services within the community. As the rest of the protocol wraps, hosting and application services will be able to do the same.
- brabel 3y ago> The point is to make social media providers replaceable And how is that a sustainable business?
- detourdog 3y agoNot paying close attention but I thought the problem being fixed was that twitter was a business and blustery is designed as a protocol.
- _Algernon_ 3y agoThe same way that any healthy market with competition is. The companies providing good services are sustainable, while those unable or unwilling to compete aren't.
- that_guy_iain 3y agoAny healthy market with competition builds a wall of vendor lock-in. The aim is always easy to adopt hard to walk away from.
- binary132 3y ago"How could a business succeed without trapping its customers?"