3 ms·
> BigQuery public datasets would be a better hosting platform for this kind of data. I worry they are not anticipating the security & budgeting issues of hostin
by AdieuToLogic 3y ago
> BigQuery public datasets would be a better hosting platform for this kind of data. I worry they are not anticipating the security & budgeting issues of hosting a real-time API.
Then use their API to populate a BigQuery public dataset and make available to all.
Otherwise, perhaps we, as outside observers, need to consider the possibility that those whom made the decisions to provide this service as such did so for reasons which we may not be aware.
- tonymet 3y ago[flagged]
- AdieuToLogic 3y ago> Are you new here? Yes, I am new here. So why don't you tell me why you haven't answered this question I posited earlier: Why are you arguing for a US government agency to require its citizens to pay for access to data which they have already paid for by funding said agency?
- dylan604 3y agoThere's a difference from paying for the information, and paying for the expense of delivering that information. You have to pay for official copies of documents like birth/marriage/death certificates. To get copies of public court documents costs as well even though you can read the data for free. Toner/paper isn't free, fancy paper for certs aren't free. You can have the data, but you gotta pay for the copy.
- tonymet 3y agowell said
- tonymet 3y agook good suggestion here you go nps-public-data.nps_public_data
- guruparan18 3y agoLooks like access denied? Good work!
- tonymet 3y agohttps://github.com/tonymet/nps-public-data https://github.com/tonymet/nps-public-data
- tonymet 3y agohttps://github.com/tonymet/nps-public-data https://github.com/tonymet/nps-public-data
- tonymet 3y agothe following tables are now available: parks people feespasses