2 ms·
> So, it seems "office politics is not optional" is based on the unstated premise: "if success in the workplace is the only thing you care about." > As for me,
by saghm 3y ago
> So, it seems "office politics is not optional" is based on the unstated premise: "if success in the workplace is the only thing you care about."
> As for me, I've been a developer for 25 years and never wanted to go into management. I love my job because I love to code and I love learning new things. I'm 100% not the target audience for this book.
Agreed. I think it's also a false dichotomy that you either have to "play the game" or "not play the game"; as most things, how much you want to "play the game" is a spectrum, and there's definitely merit in picking your battles. I ultimately don't care enough about most technical decisions in the products I've worked on to try to outmaneuver someone else who's trying to play politics, but if someone is actively politicking to try to affect _me_ specifically rather than the product, I'm not likely to stand by and let it happen rather than try to influence things. It's useful to be able to understand how office politics work from defensive perspective even if you don't plan to actively utilize it.
- mlrtime 3y agoI think some of the debate here is that politics is always happening to you, you have no choice but to play the game. You can be passive or active, you are just choosing to be passive but you're still playing. So, if you don't want to play it's still better to know the rules.