It would be so interesting to try to build an organization that tries & works to discern, rather than leaving everyone to fend for themselves & playing the game

It would be so interesting to try to build an organization that tries & works to discern, rather than leaving everyone to fend for themselves & playing the game. There's various systems of 360 review, but they seem to silently boil out into a discussion between manager and employee. To actually combat "the game", we need both a real attempt at direct & honest assessment first, and we need to radiate out the findings, share awareness & impact second. As we do it, the structure of the org is still implicit, game-bases: we need to make it clear what these witnesses & testimonies have sussed, share our understanding of things are seem now. Actual decision making power needs to be vested in people based on the results. These reviews to serve the corporate need to assess never seem to come around & reify the findings: they're left a mystery to employees and power remains a structureless tyranny, to forever be interpreted by game players as they may. Down with the game players. Do good shit instead. (Empower interesting people, even if they don't play the game.)