4 ms·
Because std::string is pretty much the worst way how one would implement a string type. Sometimes it's better to not have a feature than to have a broken featur
by flohofwoe 3y ago
Because std::string is pretty much the worst way how one would implement a string type. Sometimes it's better to not have a feature than to have a broken feature.
- jakearmitage 3y agoCould you point me to implementations that you believe are good? Much appreciated.