2 ms·

Most of the "bad" AI image examples in this article are from the /r/weirddalle subreddit, which intentionally highlight bizarre and nonsensical images: https://

• protocolture 3y ago
  Right so the author has taken the most extreme level of weirdness and tried to use it as an example of normal image generator output. Thats quite dishonest.
  • zetsurin 3y ago
    Totally anecdotal, just tonight i saw a video my child was watching with generated images. At first i thought, I've seen that face in generated images, i think, then we looked a little closer, and noticed obvious mistakes (extra or weird fingers, weird body positions, cross eyes where you wouldn't expect them). Of course it's the first time I've spotted it in the wild where it wasn't explicitly marked as generated content, so maybe i've missed a bunch.
    • lee101k 3y ago
      [dead]
    • protocolture 3y ago
      That totally happens, and its not like the blog post is definitely wrong. Its just dishonest, which undermines its own argument.