2 ms·
A small medical innovator who's going to charge twice the price for a device that only has the oxygen monitor. Hooray. > The largest companies are barely inno
by shadowgovt 3y ago
A small medical innovator who's going to charge twice the price for a device that only has the oxygen monitor.
Hooray.
> The largest companies are barely innovating at all
Well, Apple had an oxygen monitor integrated into their smartwatch. That's pretty innovative.
... Until the government forces them to stop I guess.
- echelon 3y ago> A small medical innovator who's going to charge twice the price for a device that only has the oxygen monitor. When it's not subsidized by the unrelated business unit profit of a monopoly, well, yeah. > That's pretty innovative. ... Until the government forces them to stop I guess. Apple's finally getting the treatment they give to their developers!
- shadowgovt 3y ago> When it's not subsidized by the unrelated business unit profit of a monopoly, well, yeah. Indeed. And that sucks for the consumer. Why should we consider subsidizing less profitable beneficial offerings with more profitable offerings a bad thing? That's how every charity the industrial barons put together that still maintain some of the civic spaces in the US came to be. The steel boom funding a library and an opera house and all that.