> If they offer stability, they hardly offer nothing. You're somehow assuming that those who are attractive and have something to offer in terms of romantic re

> If they offer stability, they hardly offer nothing. You're somehow assuming that those who are attractive and have something to offer in terms of romantic relationships have an exclusive monopoly on economic stability. > Why is it okay to leverage your looks and personality, but not stability? You can try to leverage anything you'd like. Hell, pick up juggling and work on that too. The point is that you are not entitled to a spouse just because you hold a job, and if you are a lousy person then don't be surprised when you repel people. You don't own people and you are not entitled to abuse others by holding your income over them. If you want paid services, hire someone. In the meantime, don't be surprised that people with free will opt to stay with people they actually like and stay away from creeps who think they are entitled to other people.