> Unfortunately, that's only if you can avoid D Strings. Otherwise, you'll need to use toStringZ which makes copies of each string to ensure they have a null te

> Unfortunately, that's only if you can avoid D Strings. Otherwise, you'll need to use toStringZ which makes copies of each string to ensure they have a null terminator. There's nothing that would prevent them from using C strings. Since they want a safe language, I doubt this would be a reason they don't want to use D. > I'm still learning new stuff after several weeks using D. The basics are indeed simple, but there's A LOT of stuff in D. This is a bad question, because there really is no language in 2024 that you can learn everything in a day. > D is evolving slowly but evolving. Again, a bad question. Even C is evolving. The main complaint about D is that it isn't evolving fast enough, with too much emphasis on avoiding breaking changes. If they implement editions, it actually would work as OP wants, because code that compiles today will compile forever in the future.