3 ms·
> At "20-70 miles per day" of charge from the solar panels that is happening with any kind of normal driving habits. It's absolutely not doing 70 miles a day,
by masklinn 3y ago
> At "20-70 miles per day" of charge from the solar panels that is happening with any kind of normal driving habits.
It's absolutely not doing 70 miles a day, and given how large and boxy the structure is when folded, the car is probably losing more than that in increased drag unless it's only ever crawled.
- gpm 3y agoIf your argument is "the article is just flat out lying" I don't think we have a set of shared beliefs by which we can have an interesting conversation.
- masklinn 3y agoAll the pictures in the article are the 2000W version while the article is making ass-pull estimates for a 4000W version. I think "the article is probably bullshit" is pretty fair.
- gpm 3y agoSure, but the bar for calling an article "probably bullshit" requires more than "well it looks at bit unaerodynamic" and introducing that argument as far down into a comment chain as you did instead of as a reply to the article is just strange. > All the pictures in the article are the 2000W version while the article is making ass-pull estimates for a 4000W version. This isn't clear to me? Perhaps the video makes it clear though, I haven't watched that.