> and then there's the issue of consent. You mentioned this twice within two messages. What exactly is your agenda here? Consent is entirely irrelevant in the

> and then there's the issue of consent. You mentioned this twice within two messages. What exactly is your agenda here? Consent is entirely irrelevant in the context of CSAM, since the consent of a child does not authorize anybody to produce pornography of them. I don't support the idea of deepfakes, yet despite agreeing with most else you said I'm more disturbed that you're in favor of normalizing the idea that anybody exercising their right to expression is beholden to the feelings of their subject. You do realize what chilling effect that has on basic discourse? Consider the absurdity of someone photoshopping foreskins back onto Israeli dudes' nudes in protest of the (non-consensual!) RIC practices of the Jews.