3 ms·
This is a serious study of actual "raw data" that directly contradicts Graeber: "Despite generating clear testable hypotheses, this [Graeber's] theory is not b
by Keysh 3y ago
This is a serious study of actual "raw data" that directly contradicts Graeber:
"Despite generating clear testable hypotheses, this [Graeber's] theory is not based on robust empirical research. We, therefore, use representative data from the EU to test five of its core hypotheses. Although we find that the perception of doing useless work is strongly associated with poor wellbeing, our findings contradict the main propositions of Graeber’s theory. The proportion of employees describing their jobs as useless is low and declining and bears little relationship to Graeber’s predictions."
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/09500170211015067 https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/09500170211015...
- bhaak 3y agoAnd here is a serious study that supports Graeber. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09500170231175771 https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09500170231175771 > Contrary to previous studies, it thus finds robust support for Graeber’s theory on bullshit jobs. At the same time, it also confirms existing evidence on the effects of various other factors, including alienation. Work perceived as socially useless is therefore a multifaceted issue that must be addressed from different angles.