One angle is missing in this article: the judge stated that the intention by the lawmaker was to criminalize any kind of hacking when they have introduced the l

One angle is missing in this article: the judge stated that the intention by the lawmaker was to criminalize any kind of hacking when they have introduced the law, so it doesn’t matter how strong the password was or how good it was protected. Frustratingly, the judge is absolutely right. That was precisely the intention behind the law change back then. I just hope the law will be changed by the government, which (despite all their quarrels) is a much saner one than the one which changed that law.