4 ms·

We absolutely do not have to sacrifice human lives to grow, and the lessons learned in other countries are readily available to study.

• sillysaurusx 3y ago
  Are you sure? I’m equally skeptical of the claim that zero sacrifices are necessary in order to grow. The history of every society would seem to disagree. The question seems to be what’s an acceptable threshold, why, and who. These aren’t easy questions. They’ve been with us since humans first started forming tribes. (I said much the same thing as you in an adjacent comment, but it’s worth framing the sentiment in a way that’s not mistaken. Otherwise it’s little more than dogma, whether on one side or the other.)
  • nonbirithm 3y ago
    It's sort of the same thing with "all regulations are written in blood", right? For example, many of the current set of laws, regulations and best practices that prevent people on planes from dying were only enacted after people in the past died from scenarios that were either unknown unknowns or had never been observed in practice before. And that I think applies to many types of regulations besides just aviation.
    • TaylorAlexander 3y ago
      I think what I am disagreeing with is the idea that India has to learn the lessons the hard way which other places learned 100 years ago. With good administration a lot of those lessons could be learned through research, not deaths. This reduces the need to follow the same path in the same way. But it requires a will people are saying is not there.