I think that's my bottom line reason why I didn't include it. This is all about factorization. 1 is the background color, because anything times 1 is itself.

I think that's my bottom line reason why I didn't include it. This is all about factorization. 1 is the background color, because anything times 1 is itself. But I don't think 0 would quite fit with the pattern. What do you think of my plans for a prime factorization scarf? http://sonderbooks.com/blog/?p=10000 http://sonderbooks.com/blog/?p=10000