5 ms·

Instrumentation for everyone but only if you are on Windows. It so sad to see the level of support for Linux in this domain.

josephg 3y ago
The tool is opensource - looks like it’s published under an MIT license. If Linux support matters to you, maybe you can get involved or fork the project. It supports a remote debugging protocol - so as a first pass you might be able to add Linux support without needing to port the UI. I agree with you - I wish more tools like this supported Linux. But I also really respect the original author’s effort here. Making a project like this is a lot of work already. They’re under no obligation to support Linux if they don’t use Linux themselves. Letting the community step in to add Linux support is, in my opinion, opensource done right. https://github.com/GPUOpen-Tools/GPU-Reshape https://github.com/GPUOpen-Tools/GPU-Reshape
- BizarroLand 3y ago
  This is the most common response I see online. Someone says, "It sucks that X doesn't do Y" and invariably someone pops up to say, "Dedicate your life to solving this problem for yourself. I don't know and could not be forced to care if making X do Y is something you are qualified to do or have the skillset for. Here's were you can go to start finding out what world of misery you have created for yourself under my careful guidance." Making a statement about X not doing Y is not a complaint, it's not a request for others to do work. It's not an order from a disgruntled customer. It's the people stating a want, that is all. If enough people agree, then the right people might make that a reality, that is all. Not every critic is necessarily a good filmmaker.
  - josephg 3y ago
    > Making a statement about X not doing Y is not a complaint, it's not a request for others to do work. It's not an order from a disgruntled customer. I’m sorry to say but the comment above came across that way to me. Someone has gone to tremendous effort to build a great tool and opensource it. The reaction? > Instrumentation for everyone but only if you are on Windows. It so sad to see the level of support for Linux in this domain. This isn’t “cool project, it’d be even better with Linux support”. I read that as “I’m actively sad you released your project without Linux support. Despite all your free work, my life is worse because you haven’t gone the extra mile to also cater to my needs in particular”. There’s no balance there. No acknowledgement of how much work it might be to add Linux support. Or that the commenter has no interest in lifting a finger to help out themself. I can only speak to my own reaction, but I found it a bit of a lazy, entitled comment. And by all means criticise away. This is hacker news after all. But it’s also hacker news. A place for the people who build. Sitting on the sidelines and complaining doesn’t impress me much. To use your metaphor: not every critic makes a good filmmaker. But this isn’t a forum for movie critics. It’s a forum for filmmakers and budding filmmakers. You don’t have to be great. But you do need to pick up a camera to earn my respect.
pjmlp 3y ago
Maybe Valve can give an helping hand, when they stop helping Windows developers having to bother with GNU/Linux.
flohofwoe 3y ago
The tool is targeted towards game developers, and those mostly work on Windows. I would expect that the guts of this tool are not easy to port to other operating systems. And besides, if it would be cross-platform and they would have picked Electron for the app scaffolding, people would complain thst it is an Electron tool instead.
- shmerl 3y ago
  The post literally says: > Linux® support is a planned addition. So it doesn't sound like they'd deliberately use something hard to be cross platform. I'm not a fan of C# based UI, but I suppose it's portable. UPDATE: Looks like it's using this: https://avaloniaui.net https://avaloniaui.net
shmerl 3y ago
It's supposedly planned: > Linux® support is a planned addition.

josephg 3y ago

The tool is opensource - looks like it’s published under an MIT license. If Linux support matters to you, maybe you can get involved or fork the project. It supports a remote debugging protocol - so as a first pass you might be able to add Linux support without needing to port the UI. I agree with you - I wish more tools like this supported Linux. But I also really respect the original author’s effort here. Making a project like this is a lot of work already. They’re under no obligation to support Linux if they don’t use Linux themselves. Letting the community step in to add Linux support is, in my opinion, opensource done right. https://github.com/GPUOpen-Tools/GPU-Reshape https://github.com/GPUOpen-Tools/GPU-Reshape

BizarroLand 3y ago
This is the most common response I see online. Someone says, "It sucks that X doesn't do Y" and invariably someone pops up to say, "Dedicate your life to solving this problem for yourself. I don't know and could not be forced to care if making X do Y is something you are qualified to do or have the skillset for. Here's were you can go to start finding out what world of misery you have created for yourself under my careful guidance." Making a statement about X not doing Y is not a complaint, it's not a request for others to do work. It's not an order from a disgruntled customer. It's the people stating a want, that is all. If enough people agree, then the right people might make that a reality, that is all. Not every critic is necessarily a good filmmaker.
- josephg 3y ago
  > Making a statement about X not doing Y is not a complaint, it's not a request for others to do work. It's not an order from a disgruntled customer. I’m sorry to say but the comment above came across that way to me. Someone has gone to tremendous effort to build a great tool and opensource it. The reaction? > Instrumentation for everyone but only if you are on Windows. It so sad to see the level of support for Linux in this domain. This isn’t “cool project, it’d be even better with Linux support”. I read that as “I’m actively sad you released your project without Linux support. Despite all your free work, my life is worse because you haven’t gone the extra mile to also cater to my needs in particular”. There’s no balance there. No acknowledgement of how much work it might be to add Linux support. Or that the commenter has no interest in lifting a finger to help out themself. I can only speak to my own reaction, but I found it a bit of a lazy, entitled comment. And by all means criticise away. This is hacker news after all. But it’s also hacker news. A place for the people who build. Sitting on the sidelines and complaining doesn’t impress me much. To use your metaphor: not every critic makes a good filmmaker. But this isn’t a forum for movie critics. It’s a forum for filmmakers and budding filmmakers. You don’t have to be great. But you do need to pick up a camera to earn my respect.

pjmlp 3y ago

Maybe Valve can give an helping hand, when they stop helping Windows developers having to bother with GNU/Linux.

flohofwoe 3y ago

The tool is targeted towards game developers, and those mostly work on Windows. I would expect that the guts of this tool are not easy to port to other operating systems. And besides, if it would be cross-platform and they would have picked Electron for the app scaffolding, people would complain thst it is an Electron tool instead.

shmerl 3y ago
The post literally says: > Linux® support is a planned addition. So it doesn't sound like they'd deliberately use something hard to be cross platform. I'm not a fan of C# based UI, but I suppose it's portable. UPDATE: Looks like it's using this: https://avaloniaui.net https://avaloniaui.net

shmerl 3y ago

It's supposedly planned: > Linux® support is a planned addition.