3 ms·
I'll take a look. What I like about WG is with the defined operations on the server, I then get a typed client I can use in Typescript, Openapi (which I can use
by Jonovono 3y ago
I'll take a look. What I like about WG is with the defined operations on the server, I then get a typed client I can use in Typescript, Openapi (which I can use to generate clients for ios, android, etc), I get postman collection. Pretty much any client I want to consume my api from, I have a client ready to go. Now, I make changes to any of my operations, my clients will complain.
- owlstuffing 3y agomanifold does the same by working directly from graphql, no codegen steps to screw sync. if changes are made to graphql definitions, the client fails to compile.
- Jonovono 3y agoah, sounds interesting thanks. Will give it a look!