3 ms·
Probably a typo for BCE (Before Common Era)?
by kirubakaran 3y ago
Probably a typo for BCE (Before Common Era)?
- dang 3y agoFixed above. Thanks!
- jfoutz 3y agoit's such a weird phrasing. the article just says, 45000 years ago. There are a few more refined dates, but, like 45k seems good enough. maybe too long for the title? I think more likely, a programmer so frustrated with relative time handling the refuse not to give a relative time, but fat-fingered the anchor.
- AlotOfReading 3y agoThe actual paper uses 47 kiloanni, so the HN title is correct. It's the phys.org author that got the numbers wrong.