4 ms·
Using manifold-graphql[1], at least on the client side, has had a similar productivity gain here. 1. https://github.com/manifold-systems/manifold/tree/master/m
by owlstuffing 3y ago
Using manifold-graphql[1], at least on the client side, has had a similar productivity gain here.
1. https://github.com/manifold-systems/manifold/tree/master/manifold-deps-parent/manifold-graphql https://github.com/manifold-systems/manifold/tree/master/man...
- Jonovono 3y agoI'll take a look. What I like about WG is with the defined operations on the server, I then get a typed client I can use in Typescript, Openapi (which I can use to generate clients for ios, android, etc), I get postman collection. Pretty much any client I want to consume my api from, I have a client ready to go. Now, I make changes to any of my operations, my clients will complain.
- owlstuffing 3y agomanifold does the same by working directly from graphql, no codegen steps to screw sync. if changes are made to graphql definitions, the client fails to compile.
- Jonovono 3y agoah, sounds interesting thanks. Will give it a look!