4 ms·
There was no danger to life in this scenario. It’s not for the car to figure out how to “not do this”, it’s for you.
by darkr 3y ago
There was no danger to life in this scenario. It’s not for the car to figure out how to “not do this”, it’s for you.
- laweijfmvo 3y agoreplace “parked car” with “child”. Would it have stopped then?
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- bfdm 3y agoIn cars with parking sensors, it would likely have beeped at you aggressively unless you disabled that. It doesn't auto-brake but does do a good job of avoiding such impacts by alerting to objects nearby you might not see, including cross-traffic detection when backing out of parking spaces.
- jimmaswell 3y agoI've seen commercials specifically advertising automatic braking upon detection of a child. The technology seems to definitely be out there.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- beejiu 3y agoThe level of automation in cars today is designed to _assist_ the driver, not replace the driver or absolve them of responsibility for their vehicle.
- darkr 3y agoI have no idea what car you’re driving or what safety features it has.. but more importantly, your response to a crash caused by your own carelessness is to be morally indignant… towards your car?
- HnUser12 3y agoDepends on your car. Some cars only activate these systems after a certain speed. Even then you can still overpower the system.