4 ms·
Got it, in my opinion the structure is likely to mislead people because it doesn’t make clear that it refers to ‘one-to-one’ relationships at the outset (in fac
by jarym 3y ago
Got it, in my opinion the structure is likely to mislead people because it doesn’t make clear that it refers to ‘one-to-one’ relationships at the outset (in fact not even, it deals with the cases of one-to-one and one-to-none) - it only refers to ‘left join’.
- wood_spirit 3y agoYeap, the whole article is confusing to us who are already very familiar with eg SQL joins and things. It’s not using mainstream terminology. But I guess we are not the audience.
- HelloNurse 3y agoI agree that this article is introductory, but it makes the many non-standard and anti-standard terms (e.g. "vertical joins") less forgivable: misleading learners is worse than irritating experts.