4 ms·
You got challenged, as if we have all the answers there are. Thing is, path to AGI and beyond inevitably leads to those hard questions from the beginning which
by Keyframe 3y ago
You got challenged, as if we have all the answers there are. Thing is, path to AGI and beyond inevitably leads to those hard questions from the beginning which we have zero idea about how to even define, or at least some proxy definition exists, such as what is and what isn't, what is consciousness, interplay between layers of psyche and how it translates to intelligence and everything else, biological ship of theseus, etc.. it becomes philosophical quite fast and there are more questions there than answers.
- anon84873628 3y agoThese arguments are so bewildering to me. Intelligence is very easy to define and has nothing to do with consciousness. It is simply the ability to model an external reality and then take action according to inputs. After combining enough specialized modules together with a management layer, we will essentially have AGI. Of course it won't be human, because human intelligence is tightly coupled to human perception.
- Keyframe 3y agoThese arguments are so bewildering to me. My friend, that's because you stopped reading once you had your framework set in and decided to pontificate. Let me highlight the point for you, it might be easier to grasp: path to AGI and beyond inevitably leads to those hard questions... ... how it translates to intelligence and everything else there is nothing simply about it, there is nothing guaranteeing anything about it and there is everything about it once we start pursuing things AGI - AND BEYOND. Notice the keywords.