3 ms·
The artifacts are a non-issue. It's intended images with nightshade are intended to be silently scrapped and avoid human filtering.
by GaryNumanVevo 3y ago
The artifacts are a non-issue. It's intended images with nightshade are intended to be silently scrapped and avoid human filtering.
- minimaxir 3y agoThe artifacts are extremely an issue for artists who don't want their images damaged for the possibility of them not being trained by AI. It's a bad tradeoff.
- GaryNumanVevo 3y agoNightshaded images aren't intended for portfolios. They're mean to be uploaded enmasse and scraped later.
- AJ007 3y agoTo where? A place no one sees them and they aren't scraped?
- filleduchaos 3y agoI think the point is that they're akin to a watermark. Even before the current AI boom, plenty of artists have wanted to showcase their work/prove that it exists without necessarily making the highest quality original file public.
- Diti 3y agoMost serious artists I know (at least in my community) release their high-quality images on Patreon or similar.
- pgeorgi 3y agoFor example in accounts on image sites that are exposed to suspected scrapers but not to others. Scrapers will still see the real data, but they'll also run into stuff designed to mix up the training process.
- the8472 3y agodo you mean scrapped or scraped?
- GaryNumanVevo 3y agoscraped
- soulofmischief 3y ago> The artifacts are a non-issue. According to which authority?