3 ms·
I can’t really see any difference in those images on the Twitter example when viewing it on mobile
by pimlottc 3y ago
I can’t really see any difference in those images on the Twitter example when viewing it on mobile
- pxc 3y agoI don't have great vision, but me neither. They're indistinguishable to me (likewise on mobile).
- Gigachad 3y agoI was on desktop and it looks like pretty heavy jpeg compression. Doesn't completely destroy the image, but it's pretty noticeable when blown up large enough.
- milsorgen 3y agoIt took me a minute too but on the fast you can see some blocky artifacting by the elbow and a few spots elsewhere like curtain upper left.
- Keyframe 3y agolook at the green drapes to the right, or any large uniform colored space. It looks similar to bad JPEG artifacts.
- 0xcde4c3db 3y agoI didn't see it immediately either, but there's a ton of added noise. The most noticeable bit for me was near the standing person's bent elbow, but there's a lot more that becomes obvious when flipping back and forth between browser tabs instead of swiping on Twitter.
- vhcr 3y agoThe animation when you change images makes it harder to see the difference, I opened the three images each in its own tab and the differences are more apparent when you change between each other instantly.
- dontupvoteme 3y agoOne of the few times a 'blink comparator' feature in image viewers would be useful!
- SirMaster 3y agoBut that’s not realistic? If you have to have both and instantly toggle between them to notice the difference, then it sounds like it’s doing its job well and is hard to notice the difference.
- battles 3y agoThe person who drew it would definitely notice.
- bowsamic 3y agoWhat kind of artist is not going to be bothered with seeing huge artifacting on their work? Btw for me it was immediately noticeable even on mobile
- SirMaster 3y agoIf it's huge, then why are multiple people commenting that they don't see a difference?
- bowsamic 3y agoThat is a great mystery, to me it's as clear as if someone pasted a cartoon dog onto the image, it's extremely blatant and impossible to ignore by my normal human pattern recognition.
- SirMaster 3y agoI'm looking at them on my iPhone 14 Pro and I am having a hard time seeing any meaningful difference that changes the way the artwork registers with me. I can't really imagine a case where if I had only seen the AI edited one I would have any different reaction or response to viewing the piece of art compared to having only seen the original one.
- charcircuit 3y agoThe gradient on the bat has blocks in it instead of being smooth.
- josefx 3y agoSomething similar to jpeg artifacts on any surface with a normally smooth color gradient, in some cases rather significant.
- jquery 3y agoIt's really noticeable on desktop, like compressing an 800kb jpeg to 50kb. Maybe on mobile you won't notice, but on desktop the image looks blown out.
- fenomas 3y agoAt full size it's super obvious - I made a side-by-side: https://i.imgur.com/I6EQ05g.png https://i.imgur.com/I6EQ05g.png
- trimethylpurine 3y agoI still don't see a difference. (Mobile)
- fenomas 3y agoHere's a maybe more mobile friendly comparison: https://i.imgur.com/zUVn8rt.png https://i.imgur.com/zUVn8rt.png But now that I double-check, I was comparing with the images zoomed to 200%. On desktop the artifacts are also noticeable at 100%, but not nearly as bad as in my previous comment.
- bowsamic 3y agoWhat phone are you using? It’s extremely obvious on my iPhone
- Rewrap3643 3y agoHave you done a color blindness test before? Red-green is the most common type and the differences here are mostly shades of green.
- trimethylpurine 3y agoI typically read HN in bed where the brightness is at the minimum setting. I turned the brightness up and I see it.
- Detrytus 3y agoSecond picture looks like you were looking at it through a dirty window, there's lot of pale white stains, or light reflections, it's really blurry.
- blincoln 3y agoLook at the forehead and arms. The processed version looks like it's been run through a posterization filter.